Gaviria is one of the leaders of the "We must talk about Colombia" initiative, however, Petro and his proposal for a historic treaty, which appears to be the most defined and mature option today, could not win the presidential election alone. Previous elections have shown his vulnerability as a second-round candidate by rejecting sectors that feared experiencing an economic and institutional crisis like Venezuela's. The consensus among political actors outside the historical compact is not to align with it, which greatly reduces their chances of winning.
On the other hand, if Pakatan Harapan, which aims to beat Petro in the first round, achieves that goal, it will have to appeal to Uribe's disillusioned support so as not to rely on Petro or his allies. The goal of this coalition is to defeat job email list Petros and completely bury what they consider to be the most articulate leader of Colombia's "populism" and "partisan left". It seems clear that Colombia will not have a stable future in the near and medium term. What is uncertain is whether this will be an era of more violence, or whether the country will be able to guide its.
Political debate, as happened in the 20th century. Twenty years in this twenty-first show that assassinations are still the norm for society leaders and those seeking to advance peace deals. Will young people, powered by protests and street fights, take part in mass election debates in 2022? Can they create a change in this country that overcomes the current political, institutional and moral breakdown? Without massive participation, the old powers will continue to rule Colombia with new faces. Sweden's government crisis - Prime Minister Stefan Lofven resigns and returns narrowly - sheds light on society.